Starbucks Union Leader Jaz Brisack Says Company Ousted Her – The New York Times

Jaz Brisack said her employer had refused to accommodate her scheduling requests. Starbucks said it sought to balance requests against business needs.
Send any friend a story
As a subscriber, you have 10 gift articles to give each month. Anyone can read what you share.
This article is part of our Daily Business Briefing

A Starbucks employee in Buffalo who has helped lead the union campaign at the coffee chain over the past year has accused the company of forcing her out in retaliation for her organizing efforts.
The employee, Jaz Brisack, is the subject of an unfair-labor-practice charge filed by the union, Workers United, on Tuesday evening. The charge said that Starbucks had applied scheduling and availability policies to Ms. Brisack in a discriminatory fashion, and that this had effectively caused her separation from the company.
Ms. Brisack, who has a high profile among Starbucks employees because she is a Rhodes scholar and also works as an organizer for the union, said in an interview that the company had for months rejected her requests to change her work availability to one or two days a week from three.
“For seven months, you and Starbucks have been retaliating against me by refusing to accommodate my availability and my time-off requests and scheduling me when I am not available to work in an attempt to force me to quit,” Ms. Brisack wrote in a letter she gave her manager on Tuesday. “Starbucks has deliberately made my continued employment at the company impossible.”
Reggie Borges, a Starbucks spokesman, said in a statement that the company tried to balance the scheduling requests of employees, known as partners, with business needs. “No partner is scheduled differently than other partners, or treated differently, separated or disciplined, for their position on or support of union,” he added.
Mr. Borges said Ms. Brisack’s store is regularly forced to close early because of staffing constraints.
The National Labor Relations Board has accused the company of ousting other employees under similar circumstances, including workers at the same store, according to a complaint that the agency filed this spring. Starbucks has denied the accusations, and the case is being litigated before an administrative law judge.
Ms. Brisack said she had first sought to reduce her availability in February, and then again in May. She formally requested one day per week, a Sunday morning shift, and said she had told her manager that she would compromise at two days, but that the store had required her to maintain at least three days of availability.
Ms. Brisack said that employees at her store and others had been allowed to work one or two days a week. Mr. Borges, the Starbucks spokesman, said this might have happened in the past, but that it’s not guaranteed, especially when a store has staffing issues.
This summer, Ms. Brisack began calling out of shifts she couldn’t make, she said, but doing so was unsustainable because it forced more work on colleagues and hurt morale.
“It’s an increasingly bad environment,” Ms. Brisack said. “I can’t be responsible for that. I can’t let Starbucks do that, destroy us from the inside.”
She submitted her resignation on Tuesday after asking her manager if she was going to be assigned three shifts during the next work period to be scheduled. The manager indicated that she would be.
In the letter to her manager, Ms. Brisack said she hoped to return to the company. “I look forward to coming back to work at Starbucks when the N.L.R.B. orders my reinstatement,” she wrote.


More To Explore

Education Template